If a celebration agrees to lock cash in HTLC for fee (having hashlock for time T), and it receives a charge f if the HTLC succeeds, then does it imply that the chance price of cash locked in HTLC is f? If that’s the case, I discover a bit bizarre, as a result of charge is perform of the cash transferred for fee by way of a channel and never of the time T, so this makes the 2 state of affairs invariant, social gathering A prepared to lock alpha cash in HTLC having timelock T1 and one other social gathering B locking similar alpha cash in HTLC having timelock T2 the place T1>T2. Assuming each of them use the identical charge charge coverage, then each obtain the identical charge say f_{alpha}. If each the HTLCs are canceled simply earlier than the respective timeout, is the loss simply the charge f_{alpha}? Or shall the loss be the quantified because the the cash it could have gained had it utilized alpha cash within the subsequent T1 (or T2) models?