In this examine1 from the Journal of Medical and Aesthetic Dermatology, board-certified dermatologist Babar Rao, M.D., FAAD, a professor of dermatology and pathology at Robert Wooden Johnson Medical College, and fellow researchers randomly assigned 60 contributors with pimples scars and deeper pores and skin tones to 2 teams. 

They in contrast two completely different therapies, one being a chemical peel with 35% glycolic acid and the opposite a microneedling session—each administered each two weeks for 12 weeks. 

In case you are unfamiliar, microneedling entails tiny sterilized needles that pierce the pores and skin and stimulate collagen manufacturing, thus encouraging the pores and skin to heal—in flip, the strategy helps cut back the looks and depth of pimples scars. 

Chemical peels, then again, do precisely what you’d count on—chemical exfoliants are used to take away the highest layer of the pores and skin. The pores and skin that grows again as an alternative is probably going smoother and free from discoloration. This helps to reduce the looks of pimples scars, too. 

So what did the researchers discover? Microneedling offered higher therapy outcomes in comparison with 35% glycolic acid peels in sufferers with darker pores and skin tones. 

This examine marks a significant stride on the planet of pimples scar therapies: Whereas chemical peels should be a great choice for some (if it really works for you, it really works!), microneedling could show even higher outcomes for pimples scars, particularly for these with melanin-rich pores and skin. As at all times, attempt to chat with a dermatologist earlier than reserving any of those therapies.