I’ve a UTXO with an inscription that’s now invaluable, however I unintentionally obtained it right into a non-Taproot (bech32, native segwit) pockets.

I am now conscious that due to this, I am unable to use Ordinal principle to manage which satoshis are being spent after I ship this transaction.

What I am questioning is, is there any technique to dictate which UTXO the charges come from? This was accepted right into a clear pockets, so it is at the moment the one UTXO. If I add one other UTXO, would the charges come from that as an alternative? Thus making certain that the primary UTXO is totally obtained by the receiver.

I am conscious of 1 one who was in the identical scenario. He despatched two extra UTXOs of 100k satoshis into the identical pockets, after which paid the minimal potential payment whereas holding bytes low, then pushed his transaction by the VIA btc transaction accelerator. The payment was about ~250 sats, so he had a ~250/200000 probability of failure. It went by efficiently.

I am largely curious if there’s the rest I can do to extend my odds right here, and if the logic of what I used to be instructed above is sound. It appears apparent that the sats I am sending are the identical ones which can be being obtained by the receiver, they don’t seem to be combined inside blocks, and that the one threat is that my inscription occurs to be hooked up to one of many satoshi’s inside the payment. I am additionally curious if miners might “snipe” the inscription, however I am assuming that is not potential as effectively.