In September 2022, The Epoch Instances requested the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention to launch its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) knowledge mining outcomes. PRR1 measures how widespread an antagonistic occasion is for a particular drug in comparison with all the opposite medicine within the database.
In keeping with the usual working procedures2,3 for the Vaccine Antagonistic Occasion Reporting System (VAERS), which is run collectively by the CDC and the Meals and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to carry out these knowledge mining analyses.
Not solely did the CDC refuse to launch the info, but it surely additionally supplied false info — twice — in response to The Epoch Instances’ questions concerning the monitoring being carried out. As reported by The Epoch Instances again in September 2022,4 the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses had been “outdoors the company’s purview” and that no monitoring was being achieved by them.
Finally, the company admitted it was doing PRRs, beginning in February 2021, solely to later declare they did not carry out any PRRs till March 2022. The Epoch Instances additionally cited a number of papers wherein the FDA and/or CDC claimed their knowledge mining efforts had come up empty handed.5 Now, we discover that was all a pack of lies.
CDC Monitoring Reveals A whole bunch of Security Indicators
In actuality, the CDC’s PRR monitoring reveals HUNDREDS of security alerts, together with Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and loss of life — all of which, in line with the foundations, require thorough investigation to both verify or rule out a attainable hyperlink to the photographs. As reported by The Epoch Instances in early January 2023:6
“The CDC evaluation was carried out on antagonistic occasions reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022. The Epoch Instances obtained the outcomes by way of a Freedom of Data Act request after the CDC refused to make the outcomes public …
PRR includes evaluating the incidence of a particular antagonistic occasion after a particular vaccine to the incidence in any case different vaccines. A sign is triggered when three thresholds are met, in line with the CDC: a PRR of at the very least 2, a chi-squared statistic of at the very least 4, and three or extra instances of the occasion following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared assessments are a type of statistical evaluation used to look at knowledge.
The outcomes obtained by The Epoch Instances present that there are a whole lot of antagonistic occasions (AEs) that meet the definition, together with severe circumstances akin to blood clotting within the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a scarcity of oxygen to the guts, and even loss of life. The excessive numbers, notably the chi-squared figures, involved specialists.
For most of the occasions, ‘the chi-squared is so excessive that, from a Bayesian perspective, the likelihood that the true charge of the AE of the COVID vaccines just isn’t greater than that of the non-COVID vaccines is actually zero,’ Norman Fenton, a professor of danger administration at Queen Mary College of London, informed The Epoch Instances in an e mail after operating the numbers by way of a Bayesian mannequin that gives chances based mostly on accessible info.”
Myopericarditis Is Far From the Solely Drawback
One of many few negative effects of the COVID jabs that the CDC has really acknowledged is myocarditis (coronary heart irritation), and a associated situation known as pericarditis (irritation of the guts sack). Alas, the PRR monitoring outcomes reveal there are greater than 500 different antagonistic occasions which have stronger warning alerts than both of these circumstances.
Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor skilled in statistics at Princeton College informed The Epoch Instances:7
“We all know that the sign for myocarditis is related to one thing that’s brought on by the mRNA vaccines, so it is greater than affordable to say that something with a sign bigger than myocarditis/pericarditis must be taken significantly and investigated.”
Guetzkow expanded on his commentary in a January 4, 2023, Substack article.8 Beneath is a abstract record of among the key findings from the CDC’s PRR evaluation. Guetzkow goes deeper in his article, so for extra particulars, I counsel studying it in its entirety.
For much more analyses and commentary, see Fenton’s Substack article, “The CDC’s Knowledge on COVID Vaccine Security Indicators.”9 If you wish to examine the PRR knowledge for your self, you may obtain them from The Epoch Instances’ January 3, 2023, article.10 You may also discover them right here.11
|
In people aged 18 and older, there are security alerts for 770 completely different antagonistic occasions, and two-thirds of them (greater than 500) have a stronger security sign than myocarditis and pericarditis. Of these 770 alerts, 12 are brand-new circumstances that haven’t been reported following different vaccines. Topping the record of security alerts are cardiovascular circumstances, adopted by neurological circumstances. In third and fourth place are thromboembolic circumstances and pulmonary circumstances. Dying is sixth on the record and most cancers is eleventh. Contemplating the uptick we have seen in aggressive cancers, the truth that loss of life tops most cancers actually says one thing. |
|
The variety of severe antagonistic occasions reported between mid-December 2020 and the top of July 2022 (simply over 19 months) for the COVID jabs is 5.5 instances larger than all severe stories for vaccines given to adults within the U.S. over the past 13 years (roughly 73,000 versus 13,000). |
|
Twice as many COVID jab stories had been labeled as severe in comparison with all different vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%), which meets the definition of a security sign. |
|
The proportions of reported deaths, which was solely supplied for the 18+ age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs in comparison with 4.7% for all different vaccines. As famous by Fenton,12 “If the CDC want [sic] to assert that the likelihood a COVID vaccine antagonistic occasion leads to loss of life just isn’t considerably greater than that of different vaccines the onus is on them to provide you with another causal clarification for this distinction.” |
|
Within the 12- to 17-year-old age group, there are 96 security alerts, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, hypertension, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetency, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia, thrombosis, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest ache and elevated troponin ranges (indicative of coronary heart injury). |
|
Within the 5- to 11-year-old group, there are 66 security alerts, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest ache, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s illness, menstrual irregularities and vitiligo. |
It is price noting that the CDC did not carry out its first security sign evaluation till March 25, 2022 — 15 months after the photographs had been rolled out. Why the lengthy wait — particularly because the CDC had introduced it will start monitoring in early 2021? Simply contemplate, for a second, what number of lives have been misplaced as a result of the CDC didn’t correctly monitor security, and nonetheless drags its toes on the subject of warning individuals concerning the dangers concerned.
FDA Nonetheless Refuses to Share Security Knowledge
The FDA can be required to carry out security monitoring utilizing one other approach known as Empirical Bayesian knowledge mining. The Epoch Instances first requested the FDA to launch its monitoring outcomes again in July 2022,13,14 however just like the CDC, the FDA refused and insisted the info confirmed no proof of significant antagonistic results. In different phrases, “Simply belief us. We’re specialists.”
In keeping with the FDA, the one potential sign they’d discovered by way of April 16, 2021, was for raised physique temperature.15 Then, in mid-December 2022 — simply 4 months after The Epoch Instances tried to get these knowledge — the FDA introduced that pulmonary embolism (blood clots that block blood movement within the lungs) had met the brink for a statistical sign, and continued to fulfill the standards after in-depth analysis, but it surely was solely linked to the Pfizer jab.16
As famous by The Epoch Instances,17 pulmonary embolism can be recognized as a sign within the CDC’s PRR evaluation for people as younger as 12, which actually must strengthen considerations.
The FDA additionally admitted it had already evaluated three different warning alerts: lack of oxygen to the guts, immune thrombocytopenia (a blood platelet dysfunction) and intravascular coagulation (a kind of blood clotting), however none of those continued to fulfill the brink after evaluation.
If the FDA was evaluating 4 warning alerts, why did they inform The Epoch Instances there was no proof of sick results, and why did they declare the one potential sign they’d discovered was slight fever? Are we to consider they found these alerts after The Epoch Instances requested for the monitoring outcomes after which accomplished 4 in-depth investigations in 4 months?
Regardless of the reality, it is clear that each the CDC and FDA aren’t being clear. Worse, they’ve hidden knowledge, figuring out it may imply the distinction between life and loss of life for a whole lot of hundreds of individuals.
CDC Has Ignored Clear ‘Dying’ Sign
The CDC ignoring a transparent sign for loss of life might be probably the most egregious instance of its failures as a public well being establishment. As early as July 2021, Matthew Crawford revealed a three-part sequence18,19,20 detailing how the CDC was hiding security alerts through the use of a flawed components. In August that yr, Steve Kirsch knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was ignored.
Then, in an October 3, 2022, article,21 Kirsch went on to indicate how “loss of life” ought to have triggered a sign even when utilizing the CDC’s flawed components (which is described in its VAERS normal working procedures guide22). This is an excerpt:23
“The components the CDC makes use of for producing security alerts is essentially flawed; a ‘unhealthy’ vaccine with a number of antagonistic occasions will ‘masks’ giant numbers of vital security alerts … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell: PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc24 as follows …
A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of at the very least 2, chi-squared statistic of at the very least 4, and three or extra instances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the precise vaccine of curiosity. That is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Right here it’s from the doc:
Solely somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally attempting to make the vaccines look protected would use the phrase ‘and’ within the definition of a security sign.
Utilizing ‘and’ implies that if any one of many circumstances is not glad, no security sign might be generated. As famous beneath, the PRR will hardly ever set off which just about ensures that almost all occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.
The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will hardly ever exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of antagonistic occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the components is a big quantity) so the numerator is at all times close to zero. Therefore, the ‘security sign’ is never triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”
A Fictitious Instance
Utilizing a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch defined how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly beneath the radar and never get flagged, due to this flawed components:25
“Suppose now we have the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes antagonistic occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 completely different antagonistic occasions, and every antagonistic occasion has 1,000 cases.
That implies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let’s take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million antagonistic occasions whole.
Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we aren’t even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 individuals in a yr … The purpose is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘protected’ utilizing the PRR components.”
Calculating Dying Sign for the COVID Jab
Subsequent, Kirsch calculates the PRR for loss of life for the COVID jab — utilizing VAERS knowledge and the CDC’s definitions and components. As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 antagonistic occasions whole for all vaccines aside from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million antagonistic occasions whole for the COVID jabs. This is the components as defined by Kirsch:26
“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the antagonistic occasions generated by the vaccine, the loss of life sign didn’t get drowned out!
However there’s nonetheless the chi-square check. Chi-square check outcomes had been 18,549 for ‘loss of life,’ which vastly exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square check is clearly glad for the COVID vaccine. As a result of the loss of life sign is so enormous, it even survived the PRR check.
Which means that even utilizing the CDCs personal misguided … components, all three standards had been glad:
1. PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32
2. Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549
3. 3 or extra stories: There have been over 31,214 loss of life stories obtained by VAERS … which is greater than 3
A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … A whole bunch of hundreds of American lives have been misplaced as a result of incapacity of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation … It has been identified since at the very least 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative danger than PRR.27 I do not know why the CDC does not use it.”
The CDC can be hiding the severity of negative effects in different methods. As defined by Fenton,28 the way in which negative effects are categorized by the CDC assist obfuscate the size of sure issues. For instance, “cardiac failure acute,” “cardiac failure,” “infarction,” “myocardial pressure” and “myocardial fibrosis” are listed as separate classes, though in actual life they’re all potential results of myocarditis.
By separating them, you find yourself with fewer frequency counts per class, thereby supplying you with an underpowered chi-square check so {that a} warning sign just isn’t triggered. If associated classes had been merged, far stronger security alerts would doubtless emerge.
CDC Has No Cheap Protection
The CDC is liable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Protected, and between these two databases, there is no attainable means they might ever say they did not know the photographs had been harming and killing tens of millions of People.
The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Protection Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered29) confirmed large will increase in debilitating and deadly circumstances, together with a tripling of most cancers instances.30
The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Organic Merchandise Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to individuals of all ages, together with infants and pregnant ladies.
They even added these poisonous photographs to the childhood vaccine schedule — which permits states to mandate them for college attendance — with out addressing any of the 66 security alerts discovered within the CDC’s PRR evaluation. The very fact of the matter is that the CDC has identified about these dangers all alongside, and there is no excuse for not sharing and appearing on these knowledge.
Assist Unfold the Phrase
Mainstream media are ignoring all of this, so assist unfold the phrase. Everybody must know what the CDC’s security knowledge reveal. To that finish, listed here are a couple of recommendations for how one can assist:
- Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to research the CDC’s security monitoring — We can not have a public security company that’s incapable of monitoring security and taking acceptable motion when issues are discovered, be it correcting a flawed components or saying {that a} security sign has been detected. In fact, they have to additionally publish their findings as soon as an investigation has been made.
- Contact your native newspaper and urge them to research and report on the CDC’s failure to behave on security alerts.
- Share the info on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical neighborhood is investigating these issues.
- Share this info along with your physician and members of the medical neighborhood.
- Additionally share it with college directors, and ask them to clarify how and why, in mild of those knowledge, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID photographs.
