Amid the many investigations of former President Donald Trump which are happening proper now, a brand new — or fairly, an previous — one has gained some surprising momentum.

This week, the New York district legal professional’s workplace started presenting proof to a grand jury about whether or not Trump violated the legislation in reference to a $130,000 hush cash fee to Stormy Daniels, the New York Occasions stories.

It’s possible you’ll be considering: “Stormy Daniels… That’s a reputation I’ve not heard in a very long time.” Certainly.

The world first realized of Daniels in 2018, when the Wall Avenue Journal broke information that Trump Group lawyer Michael Cohen had organized the fee, made shortly earlier than the 2016 election so the grownup movie actress wouldn’t go public together with her declare to have had an affair with Trump. Cohen, already below investigators’ scrutiny, ultimately pleaded responsible in August 2018 to violating federal marketing campaign finance legal guidelines with that fee and others, in charging paperwork that famously recognized Trump as “Particular person-1.”

Cohen claimed he’d made the unlawful fee at Trump’s path, so there was a lot hypothesis about whether or not Trump was on the hook for violating marketing campaign finance legislation too.

However as a substitute, the case fizzled out. A federal investigation was closed in 2019, and the New York district legal professional’s workplace seemed into it however appeared to lose curiosity in favor of pursuing a sprawling probe of Trump’s enterprise dealings.

So why is it again now, in 2023?

Solely Manhattan district legal professional Alvin Bragg actually is aware of the reply to that. However some context is that when Bragg first took workplace early final yr, he put the brakes on the Trump enterprise probe — a call that spurred two prosecutors to resign and was intensely criticized.

Amid this backlash, and intensifying authorized jeopardy for Trump federally and within the state of Georgia, Bragg seems to have rethought his earlier hesitancy. And he’s now embraced what the Occasions stories had change into identified in his workplace because the “zombie concept” — of pursuing costs primarily based on the hush cash.

However whether or not these doable costs, if filed, will show robust sufficient to outlive court docket scrutiny is way from clear.

It’s been some time. What was the hush cash scandal about, once more?

Phillip Faraone/Getty Photos

In October 2016 — weeks earlier than the presidential election, as Trump was being publicly besieged by a sequence of sexual harassment or assault accusations from many alternative ladies — grownup movie actress Stormy Daniels was making ready to come back ahead together with her personal story a few consensual sexual encounter she’d had with Trump in 2006. However, her representatives let it’s identified, she’d even be prepared to just accept fee for her silence.

Earlier within the marketing campaign, Cohen had labored with American Media Inc. — the dad or mum firm of the Nationwide Enquirer — to “catch and kill” unflattering tales about Trump, during which AMI would pay accusers for the unique rights to their story, after which not publish these tales. AMI executives had been concerned within the discussions about paying Daniels too, however they in the end balked — so Cohen needed to handle it himself.

Cohen arrange a shell firm, Important Consultants, and despatched $130,000 to Daniels’s lawyer on October 27. Later, after Trump gained the election, he paid Cohen again in installments in 2017.

The issue, federal prosecutors within the Southern District of New York later alleged, was that this violated marketing campaign finance legislation. They argued that since that this cash was spent to assist Trump win the election, it ought to have been disclosed as marketing campaign spending and topic to authorized limits on donations. Cohen pleaded responsible to this cost as half of a bigger plea deal, so the case was by no means examined in entrance of a jury.

But prosecutors’ concept wasn’t universally accepted. The New York Occasions described it as a “considerably novel use of marketing campaign finance legislation,” and Lawyer Normal Invoice Barr sharply questioned it after he took workplace. In any case, SDNY prosecutors informed a decide in July 2019 the case was closed, partly as a result of Trump was the sitting president and per Justice Division coverage he couldn’t be indicted.

As Trump was about to depart workplace in 2021, although, SDNY prosecutors revisited the case, discussing whether or not they need to reopen it when he now not had presidential immunity. In line with CNN authorized analyst Elie Honig’s current e-book Untouchable, prosecutors had been break up on the energy of the case.

“Some believed the proof was greater than sufficient to cost in an abnormal case, whereas others thought it was nonetheless an in depth name, although nonetheless chargeable,” Honig writes, persevering with, “Even when the proof was enough to help a cost, it additionally wasn’t a slam-dunk case within the majority view.”

He provides that some on the workforce believed the hush cash scheme was “critical, however not the top of the world,” and that it appeared “one way or the other trivial and outdated” in comparison with his later acts like attempting to overturn Joe Biden’s election win. So in the end, SDNY determined to let it lie.

So how did this transfer to the Manhattan district legal professional?

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Photos

After information turned public that SDNY had dropped the hush cash case in 2019, then-Manhattan district legal professional Cy Vance picked it up, bringing Cohen in for interviews and in search of Trump’s tax returns.

However the investigation quickly sprawled outward.

First there was the true property valuations case. Vance’s prosecutors developed a concept, backed by public proof and Cohen’s testimony, that Trump overvalued sure properties when he sought loans and insurance coverage insurance policies, however undervalued these belongings for tax functions, so he’d owe much less in property taxes. They explored costs over tax fraud, financial institution fraud, and insurance coverage fraud.

However the issue was proving Trump knew his firm was breaking the legislation, since he might have argued that every little thing his firm did was accepted by his chief monetary officer and authorized workforce, who had been specialists in such issues. So prosecutors zeroed in on that CFO, Allen Weisselberg, pressuring him for months to flip on Trump. Weisselberg didn’t achieve this.

So subsequent got here the “fringe advantages” case. In July 2021, Vance’s workplace charged Weisselberg and several other Trump enterprise entities with tax fraud. The corporate had paid condominium and automobile leases for Weisselberg and personal faculty tuition for his grandchildren, with out subjecting it to taxes. Trump himself was not charged, and the utmost penalties for Trump’s firm had been comparatively small, so this wasn’t all that threatening a case.

With that trial pending, Vance left workplace, and Bragg, the newly elected district legal professional, inherited the Trump probes in early 2022. After being briefed on the true property valuations case, he reportedly wasn’t impressed. Per the New York Occasions, Bragg informed the 2 lead prosecutors that he had doubts about shifting ahead with the case, and paused grand jury exercise. These two lead prosecutors resigned in February, and one, Mark Pomerantz, has a e-book popping out subsequent week giving his account of what occurred.

Bragg, elected as a legal justice reformer, then confronted intense criticism within the media and from Democrats for being too lenient towards Trump. He mentioned little at first, however by April he mentioned the true property valuations case was nonetheless shifting ahead. The perimeter advantages case, in the meantime, was nonetheless heading for trial, and in August, Weisselberg agreed to alter his plea to responsible (although he nonetheless didn’t flip on Trump, and was sentenced to 5 months in jail). Trump’s companies had been then convicted on the trial, and sentenced to pay a $1.6 million positive.

And in some unspecified time in the future final yr, Bragg’s workplace turned again to the place the Manhattan DA’s investigation all began: the hush cash. It not too long ago convened a grand jury to listen to proof, and introduced in Cohen for yet one more spherical of talks.

We don’t know why precisely they’ve returned to the hush cash, and we additionally don’t know the way robust the case is. Importantly, the DA can solely cost violations of New York state legislation, so federal marketing campaign finance costs aren’t related right here.

In line with New York Occasions reporters William Rashbaum, Ben Protess, Jonah Bromwich, and Hurubie Meko, although, prosecutors have a concept about the right way to cost it. The hot button is that when Trump paid Cohen again for the hush cash, he categorized it as authorized charges. Prosecutors need to argue that that amounted to unlawful falsification of enterprise data.

However since that might solely be a misdemeanor and hardly value charging, additionally they need to argue this was completed in violation of New York state election legislation, which makes it a felony. “That second side has largely gone untested, and would subsequently make for a dangerous authorized case towards any defendant, not to mention the previous president,” the Occasions reporters write.

This appears to pose the chance that the hush cash case is a little bit of a attain, a “zombie” authorized concept being resurrected now that Bragg has seemingly realized he’ll profit extra politically from being seen as attempting to take Trump down — although we will’t say for certain with out understanding extra about his proof and authorized reasoning.

For now, it may well merely be added to the pile of different authorized issues Trump has, with no finish but in sight.