Within the PR assessment membership on “nVersion=3 and Package deal RBF” (February twenty second 2023) glozow said:

However in coverage we need to strictly loosen guidelines. In any other case we may unintentionally censor transaction relay for an utility. So both we actually actually ensure that no person is utilizing it at the moment, or simply choose one thing that is nonstandard as we speak. In a way, we at all times need consensus adjustments to be delicate forks, however coverage adjustments to be “exhausting forks”.

I used to be wanting on the proposal for nVersion=3 transactions and that appears to introduce a new set of “further guidelines” that are not relaxations. So is it the case that ideally this would not be the case however the nVersion=3 proposal is ignoring this precept as a result of they’re wanted for Lightning and multiparty protocols?