Elon Musk started testifying immediately within the jury trial over whether or not his false tweets in 2018 about taking Tesla personal brought about buyers to lose billions of {dollars}.

Throughout testimony in a federal courtroom in San Francisco, Musk denied that his tweets trigger Tesla’s inventory worth to go up or down. “Simply because I tweet one thing doesn’t imply folks imagine it or will act accordingly,” Musk mentioned in response to a query from legal professional Nicholas Porritt, who represents buyers within the class-action lawsuit in opposition to Musk.

“It is tough to say that the inventory worth is linked to the tweets. There have been many instances the place I believed if I had been to tweet one thing that the inventory worth would go down,” the Tesla CEO mentioned on the witness stand.

Musk introduced up a tweet in Could 2020 during which he wrote, “Tesla inventory worth is simply too excessive imo.” Musk immediately mentioned Tesla’s inventory worth “counterintuitively” went up after the tweet.

“Although I tweeted that, for my part, the inventory worth was too excessive, the inventory worth then went up from that,” Musk mentioned immediately. “You’d assume that if I tweeted the inventory worth was too excessive, it might go down, however it really went up.”

In truth, Tesla’s inventory worth dropped 10 % on the day Musk made that tweet, although the worth did return up the next week.

“What I am making an attempt to say is the causal relationship is clearly not there merely due to a tweet,” Musk mentioned in courtroom immediately.

“Funding secured” tweet was false, decide dominated

The present case is primarily about two tweets Musk made on August 7, 2018. The first mentioned, “Am contemplating taking Tesla personal at $420. Funding secured.” The second tweet mentioned, “Investor assist is confirmed. Solely motive why this isn’t sure is that it is contingent on a shareholder vote.”

Musk solely testified for lower than a half hour immediately however will retake the stand on Monday. Due to that, Porritt hasn’t but questioned Musk concerning the particular tweets this case is about.

Choose Edward Chen already dominated that the 2 tweets about taking Tesla personal had been false and made recklessly. Earlier than immediately’s testimony started, Chen reminded the jury that they need to assume that the tweets had been false.

Nevertheless, the jury nonetheless should determine whether or not Musk knew they had been unfaithful and whether or not the tweets gave affordable buyers an impression of Tesla’s state of affairs that was completely different from actuality, Chen mentioned. The case is being held in US District Courtroom for the Northern District of California.

Earlier than Musk began testifying immediately, jurors heard from two different witnesses known as by plaintiffs—an investor who purchased Tesla inventory after Musk’s tweets and an skilled witness who testified about administration buyouts. Musk’s testimony started close to the top of the trial day.

Throughout opening statements on Wednesday, Musk’s lawyer Alex Spiro argued that Musk’s false tweets had been simply “technical wordsmith inaccuracies” and weren’t materials to buyers. Porritt mentioned that buyers purchased Tesla inventory based mostly on Musk’s declare that he’d secured funding to take the corporate personal at $420 a share.

“There was no dispute that Elon Musk lied, and there was no dispute that Tesla buyers had been harm by these lies,” Porritt mentioned.

Musk: “You are attempting to conflate deceptive with brief”

At this time, Porritt requested Musk if he is conscious that his tweets about Tesla are ruled by federal securities legal guidelines requiring them to be correct, similar to press releases and Securities and Trade Fee filings.

“Sure, however clearly, there’s a restrict you probably have 240 characters to what you possibly can say. You may clearly be much more verbose in a submitting, and everybody on Twitter understands that,” Musk answered. (Twitter’s character restrict is 280 characters, however Musk repeatedly mentioned it was 240 characters throughout his testimony.)

Porritt responded, “There isn’t any exception in SEC guidelines based mostly on the character limitation on Twitter, is there?”

“There is not, however I feel one can’t ignore the character limitation and everybody on Twitter is conscious of the character limitation,” Musk mentioned. “I feel you possibly can completely be truthful. However are you able to be complete? After all not,” Musk mentioned in response to a different query.

Musk accused Porritt of asking deceptive questions. “The tweets are truthful. They’re merely brief. I feel you are attempting to conflate deceptive with brief. That is deceptive,” Musk mentioned.

“The tweets are data that I feel the general public ought to hear,” Musk additionally mentioned.

In response to different questions, Musk additionally mentioned brief sellers within the context of why he needed to take Tesla personal in 2018. “I imagine that brief promoting ought to be made unlawful. It’s a means for unhealthy folks on Wall Road to steal cash from small buyers,” Musk mentioned.

Quick sellers “need Tesla to die” and “plant false tales within the media to get the inventory to go down and do something of their energy to make the corporate die. It is evil,” Musk mentioned.