Assuming micropayment channel networks like Christian Decker’s purposed Channel Factories involves life on Bitcoin (by way of a future smooth fork containing one thing like SIGHASH-ANYPREVOUT) and given the all too typically posed query of “How can Bitcoin scale to incorporate 6 billion folks and worldwide adoption” I can’t assist however assume this could be pretty arbitrary given the pattern of onboarding 20 folks per channel manufacturing unit transaction. I imply assuming that the driving narrative is 6 billion folks need to use BTC/Lightning community ASAP, then can’t this be simply achieved utilizing channel factories and direct cooperation with the KYC exchanges? (That is assuming the world didn’t thoughts utilizing exchanges to onboard and utilizing peer- to-peer atomic swaps wasn’t of essential significance) Coinbase, for instance, might conceivably ask for a public-key after withdrawing funds from someone’s account. They might group at the least 20 folks collectively and use their public keys to derive the 20 of 20 tapscript tackle. They might ship out the relevant data to all events after which ship the sum of all 20 peoples funds to the taproot tackle successfully onboarding 20 folks onto the Lightning Community and thus Bitcoin community with one transaction. By my calculations, the alternate might create a large transaction filling a complete block with 1 P2TR to 23,230 P2TR outputs. The arbitrary price Coinbase would cost every individual and thus put in the direction of the large transaction would greater than incentivize any miner to take the large transaction into their block because the price can be bigger than another mixture of different transactions within the mempool. Given that every output is successfully representing 20 new folks being onboarded to the community, this could imply 20*23,230 = 464,600 could possibly be onboarded per block. This could imply that you can onboard 6 billion folks in 90 days. Even if you happen to have been simply allocating 25% of every block for transactions like this and leaving the opposite 75% for normal transaction, that may nonetheless imply you may onboard the whole planet in 1 yr which appears greater than cheap to me. So is my math fallacious right here? So far as I do know a transaction may be as giant as a block. Granted, I notice I’m neglecting the time it could take to offboard all these folks however I’m coping with simply the idealized greatest case situation right here. Any ideas?