Tesla has been criticised by an Australian federal courtroom decide for searching for a “draconian” order for an arrest warrant towards a person who allegedly posted confidential inner paperwork from the electrical automotive maker on social media websites in defiance of a courtroom order.

Keith “Keef” Leech was ordered by the courtroom on 8 January to delete all data he held of any paperwork obtained from the Tesla whistleblower Lukasz Krupski associated to Tesla vehicles.

Krupski final 12 months leaked knowledge from the corporate claiming the know-how behind Tesla’s self-driving vehicles will not be protected sufficient to permit the vehicles to be pushed on public roads. The leaked materials included buyer complaints about Tesla’s braking and self-driving software program.

Leech allegedly obtained a replica of the leaked paperwork, uploaded them to cloud companies and torrent websites, and posted hyperlinks to the paperwork on social media.

The order stated Leech was restricted from publishing another Tesla technical experiences, buyer complaints, car restore paperwork, assembly notes, and product testing, evaluation and design documentation.

Nonetheless, in an interlocutory listening to on Friday, Tesla sought an arrest warrant to be issued towards Leech after he allegedly posted hyperlinks to the paperwork on the social media website Threads, Meta’s reply to X.

Justice Jonathan Seaside stated whereas Tesla had a prima facie case towards Leech for contempt of courtroom, it was unrealistic to hunt an pressing contempt of courtroom case towards him.

“I’m undecided you’re entitled to an arrest warrant,” Seaside stated. “What you’re asking for is unrealistic.”

Counsel performing for Tesla stated the corporate was “gravely involved” Leech would proceed to defy the order.

Seaside stated the corporate had apparent cures, together with requesting that Meta and Google and the opposite platforms proceed to take away the posts of the paperwork.

Tesla’s counsel stated the corporate had approached Meta searching for to have Leech’s account eliminated, however had discovered the corporate would solely take away particular person posts fairly than the account itself.

Tesla’s counsel stated the corporate needed to “in impact play whack-a-mole” as new posts might seem on quite a few completely different social media platforms within the meantime.

Seaside questioned what authority he needed to take the “draconian step” of issuing an arrest warrant for Leech, and stated the common course of for a contempt of courtroom felony proceedings needs to be adopted.

The injunction was prolonged for an extra 28 days.

German newspaper Handelsblatt printed the “Tesla Information” based mostly on 100GB and greater than 23,000 paperwork of inner knowledge Krupski shared. The title is just like the “Twitter recordsdata” reporting ensuing from inner Twitter paperwork being leaked to reporters pleasant with Twitter’s new proprietor, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in 2022.

The newspaper reported the Tesla Information paperwork included Musk’s social safety quantity.

Meta declined to touch upon the matter.